The Los Angeles Times has a lengthy article, written by on the resignation of Lisa Jackson as EPA Administrator. It includes lots of fluff, such as "Jackson said in her statement that 'I leave the EPA confident the ship is sailing in the right direction.'" The article, however, is most notable for what it omits.
One thing not mentioned is the recent exposure of Jackson's possibly criminal use of secret email accounts to hide her EPA correspondence from FOIA and her consequent need to get out of Washington before a serious investigation can begin. As this appears to be why she is resigning, the omission of it from the LA Times article is astonishing.
Also omitted is her suppression of science that disagreed with her political advocacy of global warming and the imposition of CO2 regulations which is widely touted as her signature achievement.
Some news articles contain outright falsehoods. Others, like this one, mislead by omission of the key facts. In either case, the legacy news media is not to be trusted.
PREVIOUSLY on news bias:
•CBS News in deep denial about bias
•UCLA Study: news is biased left
•If the news media is so biased, why did they turn on Obama?
•Outright lies: media claim Ann Romney referred to a black ABC News reporter as "you people."
•CBS Chief WH Correspondent cannot hide liberal slant
•News media edit tape in order to lie about George Zimmerman
•How reporters see the tea party vs. the occupiers
•How reporters see the tea party
•ABC news: 14 years of liberalism reviewed
•CNN's anti-semite
•At Cox Newspapers, they took this story seriously
•How reporters avoid reality
•News reporters and the liberal echo chamber in action
•Salon has a sexual fantasy about Palin as a dominatrix
•If only hate could change false to true
•Ignorance at McClatchy Newspapers
•Faking the news
•University study finds Fox more fair and balanced than ABC/CBS/NBC
•News media credibility at lowest level since polling began
•Living in a Fantasy World, II
•17% of US voters claim news media unbiased
•Unbiased MSM gets its "truth" from Media Matters for America
No comments:
Post a Comment